BibTeX
@InProceedings{Cubigami_CGGA2010full,
AUTHOR = {Greg Aloupis and Prosenjit K. Bose and Sebastien Collette
and Erik D. Demaine and Martin L. Demaine and Karim Douieb
and Vida Dujmovi\'c and John Iacono and Stefan Langerman and
Pat Morin},
TITLE = {Common Unfoldings of Polyominoes and Polycubes},
BOOKTITLE = {Revised Papers from the China-Japan Joint Conference on
Computational Geometry, Graphs and Applications (CGGA 2010)},
bookurl = {http://www.dlmu.edu.cn/cgga2010/},
VOLUME = 7033,
SERIES = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
ADDRESS = {Dalian, China},
MONTH = {November 3--6},
YEAR = 2010,
PAGES = {44--54},
length = {11 pages},
withstudent = 1,
replaces = {Cubigami_CGGA2010},
papers = {Cubigami_CGGA2010},
updates = {
<ul>
<li> In the abstract, the phrase “we show here that all 23 tree-like pentacubes have no such common unfolding, although 22 of them have a common unfolding” should be replaced with “we show here that all <b>27</b> tree-like pentacubes have no such common unfolding, although <b>23</b> of them have a common unfolding”.
<li> Section 3.3 says “There are several two-sided common unfoldings for a set of 23 pentacubes (one is pictured below)” but one is not actually pictured. (It was in the <a href="../Cubigami_CGGA2010/">short paper</a>.) Here is one: <br> <a href="23shapes.pdf"><img style="max-width: 100%" src="23shapes.png"></a>
<li> In Section 3.3, the phrase “There is a unique two-sided unfolding of all 22 non-planar pentacubes (Figure 8(12-27))” should be replaced with “There is a unique two-sided unfolding of all <b>16</b> non-planar pentacubes (Figure 8(12-27)), which also folds into 6 planar pentacubes for a total of 22 pentacubes”.
</ul>
},
doi = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24983-9_5},
dblp = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/cgga/AloupisBCDDDDILM10},
comments = {This paper is also available from <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24983-9_5">SpringerLink</A>.},
}